Yea, that's how it's done... it's called transcription... and whoever's been doing them recently hasn't been doing a very good job so it seems :x So frustrating!tewkeshorn said:
You must remember that this piece was published in 1967! So the modern technology that exists today didn't exist 37 years ago.tewkeshorn said:
True, though I've never encountered errors in Salvationist music, and I played a fair bit when I was in the SA. SP&S (and it's various divisions now) publish an awful lot of music, and always have done, so if they can publish error free music, why can't other publishers?Roger Thorne said:You must remember that this piece was published in 1967! So the modern technology that exists today didn't exist 37 years ago.
Admittedly not as much practise as I could do ... but practise all the same. It's not that hard, just the odd bit here and there that could catch me out come March.ploughboy said:Practicing Dave!! Bravo, I feel much better now!! thank, hope you had a good christmas!!!
Some of the errors are some elementary, like not putting numbers above the rest bars! how simple is that!!!!!!
Oh well, It seems a little sad that this isn't a suprise to anyone these days!!
It was published in 1967, but it was also used for the Finals in 1995, so surely the errors were sorted out then :shock: :?: :!:Roger Thorne said:
I think that any piece of music that you play which is considerably 'old' or typeset before the advances of todays modern technology will be prone to some error's. In those days the score and the parts were typeset seperately, and I think it would be fair to say that we all accept one or two errors to a degree.Railybobs said:I'm sure that when Tyldesley did Resurgam not too long ago there was one or two mistakes that had to be corrected.
There is an excuse, and that is COST. Although no-one will admit to it, the errors in todays music in my opinion come down to one thing - Money!drummerboy said:In my opinion, especially in this technologically aided era we live in, there is no excuse for errors in pieces.
That sounds good, gets me out of doing the trills anyway. But saying that in the flugel solo, both the Scottish co op and Faireys band play the last trill, and not the one before that which is also marked on the individual part.Roger Thorne said:That's exactly what I thought!
Missing bars and beats, added trills (flugel) staccato marks instead of tenuto etc. etc. :evil:
I agree with Dave though - Go with the Score
Correct Jo! Its the 5th bar of N which doesn't have the trill on it.Jo Elson said:That sounds good, gets me out of doing the trills anyway. But saying that in the flugel solo, both the Scottish co op and Faireys band play the last trill, and not the one before that which is also marked on the individual part.