I am not subscribed to WOBPlay and relied on 4BR comments today. I'm not sure I'll bother in the future as it appears to be a wasted effort that is so well illustrated today in the case of Desford and Fairey. It appears that even Steven Mead's scoring concept can't eliminate subjectivity, but to that extent? Steven had Desford 5th and Fairey 6th but the judges placed them 17th and 15th respectively. That's a huge disparity and I would love to read the adjudicator's comments for each. I've read some comments elsewhere and it appears I'm not alone in my confusion.