Over the last 100 year+ we have had pride in out amature movement.
That we do this for a hobby,
when we offer assistance it has in the majority of cases been on a vocational basis without cause to winge.
But.... how deep are our amature roots in reality ?
Do our principals hold strong when confronted with demanding sponsors for instance ?
Can commercial interest at any level excercise influence over us to surpress the freedom amature status offers ?
Now in the UK money seems to influence interesting player moves, types of music available or deemed fit to popularise, instruments chosen for example.
Popular forums deliberating about the finantial and ethical aspects marbled throughout our ruling banding infrastructure.
Self proclaimed 'pioneers' spin webs attempting to lure more funds towards the expences pot.
Is it democratic, is it self appointed ? why does it exist, for whom, and what do WE 'actually' need it for in many cases.
Which ruling body will make a move for control next ? Do we want even more control ? Will we have a choice ?
At the end of it all, how does this effect what really matters. ?
Are our amature morality and principals threatened ?
Has banding changed (for better or worse) or are we still in the good old days ?
Step out of the Banding Arena for a second or two and take a look at the game thats playing out from a spectators view point.
is our movement is conducting itself intelligently ?
Is our movement still proud or fit to be Amature ? or are we predominated towards cynicism of amature actions or offerings ?
Are we been hearded towards the professional mindset ? and the accentuation that everything 'must' have a price ?
Is our situation really Amature Vs Pro ? ...very sad if this is true
Is Banding still Amature ?
Amature (French - for the love of)


Reply With Quote

