What's your opinion on this recent issue folks? I am unsure about what to make of it all to be honest as the way I see it, there are several key matters that simply don't add up. Iran says that the UK boats were in Iranian waters, yet the UK says the boats were in Iraqi (UK/US alliance controlled) waters. Now then, here's what I don't get... If the UK boats were in Iranian waters, then why were they in Iranian waters...? If they were, then they shouldn't have been and it's no wonder the situation has ensued. However, if the boats were in Iraqi waters (as Blair insists), then how and why on earth did the vast UK/US fleet of warships on patrol in that area allow several small UK boats to be surrounded and taken over by several highly armed Iranian gun boats - all of this happening in UK/US controlled waters This just does not make sense. Did the UK/US fleet not know there were several Iranian gun boats crossing the Iran/Iraq water mark and heading directly towards the small UK boats? You'd have thought they would know eh? Excuse the pun, but something smells fishy. Ask yourself this... Why would Iran lie about this...? then ask yourself why would US/UK lie about this...?