tMP Court: Dinie vS 2nd Man Down - jury vote

Discussion in 'Thread Games & Totally Random...' started by TheMusicMan, Jun 11, 2005.


Is 2nd Man Down guilty

Poll closed Jun 21, 2005.
  1. Guilty

    25 vote(s)
  2. Not Guilty

    32 vote(s)
  1. TheMusicMan

    TheMusicMan tMP Founder Staff Member

    Now that you have had an opportunity to review the evidence, please make your decision... is 2nd Man Down guilty or not guilty...?
  2. yonhee

    yonhee Active Member

    aww you hid the votes :(
  3. Will the Sec

    Will the Sec Active Member

    Your Honour, I thank you for your consideration.

    Just to clarify - if one has voted in the first poll, can one vote again?

    Thank you.

    Counsel for the Prosecution
  4. TheMusicMan

    TheMusicMan tMP Founder Staff Member

    Yes... this is indeed the case.
  5. HBB

    HBB Active Member

    Alla Henman Hill...

    "Go Diane!!"
  6. Di

    Di Active Member

    Go where? :confused:
  7. Vickitorious

    Vickitorious Active Member

    I've voted!

    I'm not saying who for though, I'll just say one thing..

    Mumie flushed the toilet this afternoon while I was in the shower! And it burnt me! AND it was on purpose! She knew I was in the shower! :mad:

  8. Naomi McFadyen

    Naomi McFadyen New Member

    I love the typo in the thread title ...."nd man down... lol..... unsure of his position in the band now eh? ;)

    I have voted.... shall try keep my lips sealed and not shout out in the courtroom about my feelings about this coldminded person...
  9. meandmycornet

    meandmycornet Active Member

    thats evil!!! thats far worse than any of crawfy's supposed crimes! I think we have case number 2 for the tMP court!
  10. yonhee

    yonhee Active Member

    You should do it back to her.
  11. meandmycornet

    meandmycornet Active Member

    aaah but yonhee two wrongs don't make a right, and vicki would probably be the one that would end up in trouble for it, if she did that!
  12. yonhee

    yonhee Active Member

    You're gonna be a great teacher Fi! Well she could pretend it was an accident.
  13. sevenhelz

    sevenhelz Active Member

    my mother does that kind of thing all the time. it's what families are for...

    but an outsider being mean, well, no comment...
  14. Will the Sec

    Will the Sec Active Member

    Your Honour, as this is a legal thread, is it contempt of court to post off topic?

    Posts 9, 10, 11 and 12 refer.
  15. PeterBale

    PeterBale Moderator Staff Member

    I pass on a message just received:
  16. Will the Sec

    Will the Sec Active Member


    You been to Italy again?
  17. mikelyons

    mikelyons Supporting Member

    Wassamatta you? Hey! Shut-up-a-you-face!
  18. meandmycornet

    meandmycornet Active Member

    Erm I didn't understand a word of that :( in english?
  19. Will the Sec

    Will the Sec Active Member

    Excuse me Your Great and Bountiful Balefulness, but unless you are referring to another case, you are mistaken. Judge John has imposed no reporting restrictions.

    The rest is garbage, mixing bad Latin with clichéd French and fake cases. (Crown and Sceptre! Sounds like a variant on a well known test piece. Boston Legal! Or is it “Legale de la Paris”? And Berlioz is in there somewhere…)

    Then again, if Monsieur Pierre is real he’s obviously French (!!!) so I expect he probably makes a living as a farmer, milking the PAC, and thus having plenty of time to interfere in the British Justice system whilst sunning his back next to a wine lake.
  20. PeterBale

    PeterBale Moderator Staff Member

    Although I would not normally wish to take issue with such a learned expert on legal affairs, I must protest regarding the case of The Crown v. Sceptre. Indeed it has been cited at least as frequently as its companion, The Crown v. Orb, Imperial and Mace, as argued most eloquently by l'Avocat Henri Cinq.

    I am certain that both he and Monsieur Pierre would relish the opportunity to debate this issue further at Brussels at your earliest convenience.

Share This Page